Tapwrit won — none of the other WagerMate picks was even close.
Soooo, let’s average the Derby & Preakness & Belmont results and talk about that number….
…$168.10 returned for a $36 investment.
Tapwrit won — none of the other WagerMate picks was even close.
Soooo, let’s average the Derby & Preakness & Belmont results and talk about that number….
…$168.10 returned for a $36 investment.
Ummmm. Well Cloud Computing messed up my exacta. Let’s average the Derby & Preakness results and talk about that number….
The finish order of 5-1-11-14 means the $12 exacta I played turned into $168.10.
I was impressed that Lookin At Lee could do so well from post position 1.
I made 22 win bets. I miscounted in the last blog entry — the figures show that 21 horses had an ROI over 25% — and Masochistic turned into the 22nd bet because of a scratch in the sixth race yesterday. The winning bets were on Champagne Room, Finest City, and Tourist. That’s $115.40 back on the $44 worth of win bets.
Only two of the exacta bets paid off, returning $57.60 on the 13 bets of $6 each (total of $78 spent).
For the weekend, that’s a profit of $51.00 on $122 bet.
Three points:
WagerMate likes a mix of favorites and long shots for the Breeders’ Cup races this year. I’ll place $2 win bets on every horse that WagerMate says has an ROI over 25% — that’s 7 horses on Friday, and 12 horses on Saturday.
I’ll also place $1 exacta box bets on the top 3 picks in each race.
Here are the Friday picks…
13-2-10-1 — with Creator paying $34.80 to win, and Destin paying $9.40 to place.
Didn’t see that coming…
5-1-3-11 — so, no tickets to cash.
Version 3.5 of WagerMate has been released. It has one major new feature: it uses a new track-to-track variant.
That one improvement gets us more than a 1% point increase in both the Win Rate and the ROI. Here are the back testing results on my 2009-2013 data, with the default filter:
This indicates that if you blindly followed WagerMate’s picks you’d lose 7%. If you only followed the picks for turf races, you’d win 1%.
By now, you should know that’s not how I really think you should use the WagerMate results — I want you to combine the WagerMate results with your own handicapping work. If you use the WagerMate results, instead of starting with an ROI of -20% (due to the takeout), you’re starting at -7%, and that’s a big difference.
Good luck!
The two favorites, Nyquist and Exaggerator, came in first & second: 13-11-5-14, so we missed on the win bet, but made a little profit on the exacta.
The $24 exacta ticket paid $30.60.
Won $107.50 on bets of $108.00 for an ROI of… 0%. Didn’t have a great weekend except for the $95.70 exacta in Race 9. A couple of WagerMate’s recommended bets were canceled due to scratches.
Here’s the positive spin: by blindly following WagerMate, I broke even (lets not quibble about the 50 cents) — imagine how well you can do if you do some actual study & handicapping.
WagerMate likes a lot of long shots for the Breeder’s Cup races again. I’ll place $2 win bets on every horse that WagerMate says has an ROI over 25% — that’s 7 horses on Friday, and 15 horses on Saturday.
I’ll also place $1 exacta box bets on the top 3 picks in each race.
Here are the Friday picks…
The latest version of WagerMate, build 338, has a couple of minor improvements in it:
I’m working on improving the track-to-track variant. It may take a couple of months to do all of the calculations, and insert the new work into WagerMate.
5-6-7-1
So the $9.00 superfecta bet paid $28.50.
Not bad, but, betting the exacta may have worked out better — I was hoping for long shots in the third and fourth spots.